San Diego launch finding · Vision Zero context

San Diego records carried twice the statewide vulnerable-road-user context

Between June 30, 2025 and June 29, 2026, 1,481 of San Diego’s 8,419 reported crash records, or 17.6%, carried a vulnerable-road-user or motorcycle flag, compared with 8.6% statewide.

That 2.04× recorded share supports a Vision Zero reporting question about who appears in the data, but it is not a population- or travel-adjusted risk rate and 1,601 city records lacked mappable coordinates.

Reporting window
June 30, 2025 to June 29, 2026
Published
June 30, 2026
Source
CHP California Crash Reporting System public records
View map data

Why this deserves a closer look

Vision Zero work centers fatal and serious harm while asking which road users bear the burden. This finding identifies a large difference in recorded context that deserves closer mode-specific and exposure-adjusted analysis.

01
17.6%
San Diego flagged share

1,481 of 8,419 crash records

02
8.6%
Statewide flagged share

Same dates and flag definition

03
2.04×
Recorded-share ratio

San Diego compared with statewide

04
81.0%
Coordinate coverage

6,818 mapped and 1,601 without coordinates

San Diego in statewide context

MeasureSan DiegoCaliforniaContext
Reported crashes8,419371,698Same 365-day reporting window
Vulnerable/motorcycle flags1,481 (17.6%)8.6%San Diego’s share was 2.04× statewide
Serious or fatal crashes382 (4.5%)4.1%Crash-level severity bucket
Hit-run crash flags698 (8.3%)10.1%San Diego’s recorded share was lower
Reported injured7,655Not used for comparisonSource-reported people injured
Reported killed49Not used for comparisonSource-reported people killed
Mappable records6,818 (81.0%)Not used for comparison1,888 mapped locations were inferred

Map data

These read-only maps carry the reporting window, coordinate coverage, source link, and methodology. High-volume views are display-limited and state the number of points shown.

Reported crashes associated with San DiegoOpen full map

Methodology note

  1. The city and statewide comparison uses the latest 365-day period available when this finding was prepared.
  2. A record is flagged when the normalized crash mart reports at least one vulnerable-road-user party or motorcycle party. This combined screening measure should be disaggregated before mode-specific conclusions.
  3. The statewide comparison uses the same dates, source table, and flag definition as the San Diego calculation.
  4. Of 8,419 San Diego records, 6,818 are mappable. Among the mapped records, 1,888 use street-inferred locations and 4,930 use source coordinates.

Limitations

  • The comparison does not control for population, walking, bicycling, motorcycle travel, vehicle miles traveled, road design, or reporting practices.
  • The combined flag is not a pedestrian or bicyclist rate and should not be described as one.
  • The embedded map returns a display-limited set of points and cannot show 1,601 records without coordinates.
  • Inferred points may represent a recorded road pair rather than an exact crash location.
  • Public records may be revised after publication.

Suggested citation

The Crash Data Project. “San Diego records carried twice the statewide vulnerable-road-user context.” Published June 30, 2026. Analysis of California Highway Patrol California Crash Reporting System public records, June 30, 2025–June 29, 2026. https://crashes.meruai.co/reports/san-diego-vulnerable-road-users

Press and methodology contact
contact@meruai.co
Start an inquiry
Source: California Highway Patrol California Crash Reporting System public records. Independent analysis, not affiliated with or endorsed by CHP. Data and derived locations may be revised.